Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Last Updated: 20.06.2025 01:41
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
Whats the rule that makes "please" pronounced the same as "pleas"?
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?